AWARENESS REGARDING PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSION AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF POKHARA NEPAL

Global Journal of Pharmaceutical and Scientific Research (GJPSR)

AWARENESS REGARDING PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSION AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF POKHARA NEPAL

HTML Full Text

AWARENESS REGARDING PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSION AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF POKHARA NEPAL 

Sabita Khadka1, Nirmala Neupane1*

  1. School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy Induced Hypertension (PIH) is the major contributor for maternal and neonatal complications morbidity, mortality and premature birth. It is second most leading cause of maternal death contributing to 22% of total death. Therefore, can be prevented by proper knowledge, awareness of the disease and its complications. Objective of the study to assess the level of awareness regarding PIH among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital of Pokhara Nepal. 

Methods: A descriptive cross sectional study design with a convenience sampling technique was used to assess the awareness regarding pregnancy induced hypertension among pregnant women attending antenatal outpatient department, Pokhara Academy of Health Science. The total sample size was 226 pregnant women. Face to face interview technique was used to collect the data through structured interview schedule. 

Results: More than two-third (66.8%) of respondents had moderate level of awareness, 19% had low level of awareness and only 14.2% had good level of awareness regarding pregnancy induced hypertension. The level of knowledge was not significantly associated with any of the socio-demographic variables.

Conclusion:  study concludes about two-third of pregnant women had moderate level of awareness regarding PIH and study showed no significance association between level of awareness and any of socio-demographic variables. Awareness raising program need to be conducted in the antenatal clinic to increase the awareness level of pregnant women about PIH.

Keywords: Level of awareness, Pregnancy Induced Hypertension, Tertiary hospital

Corresponding Author

Nirmala Neupane, 

School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University

Email Addressnirmalaneupane09@gmail.com

Received: 21/02/2026                               

Revised: 25/02/2026                               

Accepted: 05/03/2026

DOI: http://doi.org/10.66204/GJPSR.341-2026-2-3-1

Copyright Information 

© 2026 The Authors. This article is published by Global Journal of Pharmaceutical and Scientific Research Copyright Author (s) 2024 Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.

How to Cite

Neupane N, Khadka S. Awareness regarding pregnancy induced hypertension among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital of Pokhara Nepal. Global Journal of Pharmaceutical and Scientific Research. 2026; 2(3):341–360. ISSN: 3108-0103. http://doi.org/10.66204/GJPSR.341-2026-2-3-1

1. Introduction

Pregnancy is a unique and intricate phase in a woman’s life (Bjelica et al., 2018). Pregnancy is often marked by conditions that significantly endanger the lives of both expectant mothers and their unborn babies. Each year, more than 585,000 women globally lose their lives due to childbirth-related complications, with 99% of these deaths occurring in developing countries (Wilkerson & Ogunbodede, 2019).

Hypertension during pregnancy is defined as a systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or higher, a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or higher, or both recorded in a clinical or hospital setting. Confirmation is required, preferably on two separate measurements, or at an interval of at least 15 minutes in cases of severe hypertension (≥160/110 mmHg) (Cifkova, 2023). Unlike pre-existing hypertension, gestational hypertension develop after 20 weeks of gestation and typically resolving within six weeks after delivery (Aghajanian et al., 2006; Cifkova, 2023). Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy encompass a variety of conditions, including chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia that occurs on existing chronic hypertension with or without proteinuria (Department of Health Services, 2018).

Chronic hypertension is characterized by a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg that is present prior to conception or detected before 20 weeks of gestation also in addition antihypertensive therapy is required before pregnancy or elevated blood pressure persists beyond 12 weeks postpartum (ACOG, 2019). Gestational hypertension is identified when a previously normotensive woman develops a systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥ 90 mmHg after 20 weeks of gestation (Cifkova, 2023).

Pre-eclampsia is defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg along with proteinuria exceeding 300 mg in a 24-hour period first appears after 20 weeks of pregnancy, but both conditions typically resolve within 12 weeks after delivery. Eclampsia is characterized by the occurrence of seizures in a woman with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) that cannot be explained by other causes and convulsions can manifest before, during, or after labor (Outline of Definition and Classification of Pregnancy Induced Hypertension).

It is also estimated that pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) impacts approximately 5 to 8% of all pregnant women around the globe. Globally, 10% of pregnancies are affected by hypertension, with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia being the primary contributors to maternal and prenatal health complications and fatalities (Muti et al., 2015). Preeclampsia is responsible for approximately 16% of maternal deaths in developing nations, 25% in Latin America, and 10% in Asia and Africa (Naz et al., 2022). PIH is directly responsible for 17.6% of maternal deaths in the United States (International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2002). Mortality is strongly linked to the severity of hypertension, with eclampsia alone accounting for 22% of maternal deaths in Nepal (Department of Health Services, 2018). Eclampsia occurs in approximately 5–8% of all pregnancies worldwide, with higher prevalence in women who have pre-existing kidney issues, diabetes, or a history of pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is more common in women under 20 years and over 40 years, as well as in first-time pregnant women and those carrying twins (Index Copernicus Journal Article). Pre-eclampsia affects 5–30% of pregnancies with multiple children, and the risk of preeclampsia increases with these factors (Naz et al., 2022).

PIH is influenced by multiple risk factors, including pre-existing chronic hypertension, diabetes, renal disorders, obesity, short stature, poor nutrition, history of gestational hypertension, hereditary predisposition, autoimmune diseases (such as systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome), molar pregnancy, multiple gestations, fetal macrosomia, nulliparity, advanced maternal age, elevated BMI, and conception through assisted reproductive techniques (Karrar et al., 2025). Signs and symptoms of pregnancy-induced hypertension include a persistent headache, sudden onset of vision disturbances, loss of consciousness, ongoing discomfort in the right upper abdomen or epigastric region, nausea and vomiting, swelling of the hands and face, and seizures (Berhe et al., 2020).

PIH lead to serious complications such as ischemic heart disease, stroke, liver and kidney damage, abruptio placentae, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) in the mother (Naz et al., 2022). Similarly fetal complication includes Intra-Uterine Growth retardation (IUGR), prematurity, intrauterine death, significantly high in pre-eclampsia (Cifkova, 2023). In severe cases of pre-eclampsia, it can also cause intrauterine growth restriction and preterm birth (Chaemsaithong et al., 2022).

The majority PIH cases were seen in young women and had not completed antenatal visits about half 50% of deliveries were done by cesarean among patients with PIH, 43.1% of the deliveries were normal vaginal and other 6.9% were assisted (instrumental) deliveries (Shrestha et al., 2021). Preeclampsia was found to have a strong association with cesarean sections; with a likelihood 8.11 times higher compared to normal pregnancies (Das et al., 2023).

Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) affects approximately 6–10% of all pregnancies (Kintiraki et al., 2015). PIH can lead to severe complications, including placental abruption and hematological abnormalities affecting the kidneys, lungs, liver, and brain. Fetal complications may arise before, alongside, or independently of maternal symptoms and may include oligohydramnios, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in up to 30% of cases, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler findings, reduced resistance in the fetal middle cerebral artery, irregular ductus venosus waveforms, and stillbirth (Magee et al., 2014).

Expectant mothers should recognize the warning signs of PIH and promptly seek medical attention (Dutta, 2015). Timely diagnosis and proper intervention can greatly enhance maternal survival rates. As primary caregivers, nurses have a vital responsibility in enhancing mothers’ understanding of various pregnancy-related complications (Knowledge of Antenatal Women Regarding Pregnancy Induced Hypertension). Low awareness among pregnant women is a key factor contributing to delays in seeking healthcare and making timely decisions, creating a barrier to the early diagnosis and management of severe conditions (Berhe et al., 2020).

In Nepal, although maternal health services have expanded, there is limited data on women’s awareness and understanding of PIH, especially in specific hospital or community settings. This knowledge gap hinders the development of effective educational strategies within antenatal care programs (Basnet et al., 2023). Assessing the current level of awareness among pregnant women is therefore vital for identifying areas that require improvement and for guiding targeted interventions aimed at reducing the burden of PIH (Subedi, 2014).

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS 

A hospital -based descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed to assess the level of awareness regarding PIH among pregnant women attending a selected tertiary care hospital of Pokhara, Nepal. The study sample consisted of 226 pregnant women attending ANC OPD of Western Regional Hospital, Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences. Non-probability convenience sampling technique was used to select the sample and face-to-face structured interview schedule was used to collect data. Data were collected through a structured face to face interview schedule and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) using descriptive and inferential statistics. The sample size for this study was calculated on the basis of adequate level of knowledge on Pregnancy Induced Hypertension conducted in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, in which the adequate level of knowledge regarding Pregnancy Induced Hypertension is 17.9%.28 Estimated sample size (n₀) =   (Z^2 Pq)/e^2       and final sample for this study was 226.

3. INCLUSION CRITERIA 

Inclusion criteria for this study includes all the pregnant women who visit ANC clinic of tertiary hospital of Pokhara at the period of data collection. Those women who were available and willing to participate were included in the study.

4. DATA COLLECTION 

Data were collected through face-to-face interview using validated structured interview schedule after obtaining approval from Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences on June 1, 2025 Ref. Number 117/081. Subsequently, written permission was obtained from concerned authorities of Pokhara University. The face-to-face interview was conducted with participants using structured interview schedule and sample of the study were selected through non-probability convenience sampling technique. Privacy was maintained as the participants were not subjected to any interference as interview was conducted on breastfeeding room. Informed consent was obtained from the participants who met the inclusion criteria. Participation was entirely voluntary and participants were fully informed about the purposes, procedure and their right to decline or withdraw at any stage before obtaining the written consent. It took about 15-20 minutes with each respondent to collect information. In average I interview about 15-18 participants each day. Data was collected in a three-week period.

5. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 

Data was edited, coded, and entered in Epi-data version 3.1 with a validated command. All the entered data was transferred to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 program for further analysis. Data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics (as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation), and an inferential statistical test was applied according to the nature of the data. The findings of the study are presented in tables. The chi-square test was used to find out the association between dependent and independent variables. Bloom’s cut-off points were used to categories the level of awareness in this study. The total score was 30, and score between 24-30 i.e. 80-100% represents high level of awareness, score between 18-23 i.e.60-79% represents moderate level of awareness whereas score between 0-17 i.e.< 60 % represents low level awareness regarding PIH among pregnant women.

6. RESULTS

The data in Table 1 shows that out of 226 respondents, most of respondents were aged between 25–35 years (46.9%). The minimum age of the respondent is 18, while the maximum age is 40 years, with a mean and standard deviation of 26.87 ± 5.179. Regarding age at first pregnancy, the maximum (59.7%) reported conceiving at the age between 20-30 years. With regard to religion, majority of respondents (91.2%) follow Hinduism. About one-third (36.7%) of the respondents were Bhramin-Chhetri. More than half of the respondents (54.9%) live in joint families and most of the respondents (41.6%) reside in municipalities. The majority of respondents (88.9%) did not reported history of Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension. Regarding the primary source of information about PIH, most respondents (65.9%) identified health professionals as their source. In terms of blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy, more than two-thirds of respondents (68.8%) reported checking their blood pressure during antenatal visits only.

Table 1: Distribution of respondents on the basis of demographic Information(n=226)

VariablesFrequency (f)Percentage (%)
Age in completed years  
< 20 years2511.0
20–30 years14865.5

> 30 years

Mean ± SD (Min–Max)26.87 ± 5.179          (18–40)

5323.5
Age at first pregnancy  
< 20 years8236.3
20–30 years13559.7

> 30 years

Mean ± SD (Min–Max) 22.58 ± 3.859        (17–38)

0094.0
   
Religion  
Hindu20691.2

Buddhist

Christian

Muslim

015

003

002

6.6

1.3

0.9

Ethnicity  
Brahmin–Chhetri8336.7
Janajati5524.3

Dalit

Madhesi

82

06

36.3

2.70

Type of Family  
Nuclear9943.8

Joint

Extended

124

003

54.9

1.3

Permanent Residence  
Metropolitan city7633.6
Municipality9441.6
Rural municipality5624.8
History of PIH  
No20188.9
Yes2511.1
Primary Source of Information  
Health professional14965.8

Friends and relatives

Family members

Mass media

39

25

13

17.3

11.1

5.8

Frequency of BP Check in This Pregnancy  

Once a day

Twice in a week

Once in two weeks

7

17

47

3.1

7.5

20.8

During ANC visit15568.6

 

Data depicted in table 2 reveals that majority (89.8%) of respondents were literate and nearly half (49.1%) of respondents have had secondary level education. Meanwhile, majority (95.1%) of the respondent’s husband were literate and more than half (53.1%) have had secondary level education. In terms of occupation, the majority of respondents (70.8%) are homemakers while among husband, more than one-third (35.8%) are involved in business. In terms of family income majority of respondents (89.8%) had up to NPR 80000 monthly family income.

Table 2: Distribution on the basis of Socioeconomic Characteristics (n=226)

VariablesFrequency (f)Percentage (%)
Education of Respondent  
Literate20389.8

Illiterate

Can read and write

If Literate, Level of Education (n = 203)

Basic level

Secondary level

More than secondary level

007

016

050

111

042

3.1

7.1

22.1

49.1

18.6

Education Level of Respondent’s Husband  
Literate21595.1

Illiterate

Can read and write

If Literate, Level of Education (n = 215)

Basic level

Secondary level

More than secondary

003

008

057

120

038

1.3

3.5

25.2

53.1

16.8

Family Monthly Income  
Less than 80,00020389.8
80,000 – 160,0000177.5

160,001 – 240,000

More than 240,000

Mean ± SD (Min–Max)

54137.17 ± 36099.169 (10,000 – 300,000)

004

002

1.8

0.9

Occupation of Respondent  
Homemaker16070.8
Business02812.4
Service0229.7
Agriculture0167.1
Occupation of Husband  
Agriculture02912.8
Service05223.0
Business08135.8
Foreign employee06428.4

 

The data in table no. 3 shows that slightly more than half (52.7%) of the respondents are multigravida. Regarding parity, the maximum (48.7%) of respondents has had up to 2 previous births. In terms of trimester, two-third of the respondents (65.5%) were in their third trimester at the time of data collection. This indicates that the study population primarily comprised women in late stages of pregnancy. With regard to the number of antenatal care (ANC) visits, the highest proportion (84.5%) of respondents had attended ANC visits more than 3 times.

Table 3: Distribution of respondents according to obstetric history (n=226)

VariablesFrequency (f)Percentage (%)
Gravida  
Primigravida10747.3
Multigravida11952.7
Parity (n = 119)  
Up to 211048.7
More than 294.0
Trimester  
First trimester156.6
Second trimester6327.9
Third trimester14865.5
Gestational Age  
Up to 13 weeks156.6
14–27 weeks6327.9
28–40 weeks14162.4
More than 40 weeks73.1
Number of ANC Visits  
Up to 33515.5
More than 319184.5

 

The data presented in Table 4 illustrates that two-third (66.8%) of respondents had a moderate level of awareness, whereas only (14.2%) of the respondents shows high level of awareness regarding PIH.

Level of awarenessFrequency (f)Percentage (%)
High03214.2
Moderate15166.8
Low04319.0

 Table 4: Distribution of respondents according to the level of awareness. (n=226)

 

The data depicted in table 5 shows, majority (80.1%) have had correctly identified meaning of hypertension. Similarly, a high proportion (80.5%) had correctly identified the meaning of Pregnancy Induced Hypertension (PIH) but majority (61.9%) answered incorrectly for the gestational period in which PIH typically occurs. Regarding general knowledge of PIH, three-fourth (75.7%) correctly identified the condition. Similarly, majority (55.3%) also recognized intra-uterine growth restriction as most common fetal growth abnormalities linked to PIH. Most respondents (72.1%) reported that they would seek medical help immediately for the management of fetal movement fluctuation. Similarly, majority (93.8%) respondents were aware that both mother and baby can be affected by PIH However, more than half (55.3%) didn’t know that PIH may resolve after delivery.

 

 

Table 5: Distribution of respondent based on general awareness aspects of PIH (n=226)

Variables (Correct Response)Frequency (f)Percentage (%)
Meaning of hypertension19080.1
Meaning of PIH18280.5
Weeks of gestation in which PIH usually occurs8638.1
General meaning of PIH17175.7
Fetal growth abnormality12555.3
Measures taken when experienced any sign20590.7
Measures taken when fluctuation found in fetal movement16372.1
Individuals affected by PIH21293.8
Time period to resolve PIH10144.7

 

The data depicted in table 6 shows that majority (88.9%) responded pre-existing high blood pressure before pregnancy as risk factor for PIH. More than half (51.3%) of the respondent identified changed in body weight during PIH. However, majority (64.2%) responded incorrectly to identify the abdominal region where pain occurs during PIH. A large proportion (69.0%) were aware that swelling of certain body parts is a common symptom of PIH. However, awareness of changes in urine was limited, as nearly two-third (65.5%) answered incorrectly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Correct response
VariablesFrequency (f)Percentage (%)
Risk factors for PIH*  
Pre-existing high blood pressure before pregnancy20188.9
Family history of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy16573.0
Obesity17677.9
Maternal Diabetes15267.3
Multiple pregnancy15166.8
Changes in body weight11651.3
Pain in abdominal region08135.8
Swelling of body parts15669.0
Changes in urine7834.5

Table 6: Distribution of respondent based on awareness on clinical feature (n=226)

 

*=multiple response questions

The data depicted in table 7 shows that significantly high number (93.4%) identified consuming balanced diet is effective dietary adjustments for managing PIH. Majority of the respondents (70.4%) knew about effective lifestyle changes foe managing PIH and medications used in PIH management but nearly two-third (65.9%) gave incorrect answer about appropriate timing for anti-hypertensive drug use during pregnancy. Just above half of the participants (55.3%) and (51.8%) correctly identified the cause of convulsions in PIH and definitive treatment post-convulsion respectively. Most respondents (72.1%) reported that they would seek medical help immediately for the management of fetal movement fluctuation. Majority of the respondents agreed on (95.6%) the importance of regular ANC checkup as a preventive measure of PIH.

Table 7: Distribution of respondent based on awareness regarding prevention and management of PIH(n=226)

 Correct response
VariablesFrequency (f)Percentage (%)
Effective dietary adjustment21193.4
Effective lifestyle changes15970.4
Drugs used for management of PIH15970.4
Timing for using anti-hypertensive drugs07734.1
Primary causeof convulsion in PIH12555.3
Definitive treatment for PIH11751.8
Prevention of PIH*  
Visiting for regular ANC checkup21695.6
Being awareabout PIH and its consequences20490.3
Taking enoughrest and maintaining healthy diet19485.4
Regular blood pressure monitoring20490.3
Regular monitoring of body weight18682.3

*=multiple response questions

Data presented in the table 8 shows that there is no statistically significant association of level of awareness with any selected variable as none of the variables had p-value<0.05.   

Table 8: Association between level of awareness with selected variables (n=226)                                                                                                          

VariablesMean scorec2d.fp-value
 ≤20>20   
Age     
<27 years0670600.62110.431
≥27 years047052   
Age at first pregnancy     
<22 years0670650.01310.911
≥22 years047047   
Religion     
Hindu1080983.66810.055
Others006014   
Ethnicity     
Brahmin-Chhetri0380451.13910.286
Others076067   
Education of respondent     
Literate1040990.49710.481
Others010013   
Education level of husband   1 
Literate107108  0.539#
Others007004   
Monthly family income     
<540000770640.497 0.481
≥ 54000 and above037048   
Occupation of respondent     
Homemaker0830770.450 0.502
Others031035   
Occupation of husband     
Foreign employee0340300.257 0.612
Others080082   
Type of family     
Nuclear0530460.674 0.412
Others061066   
Primary source of information     
Health personnel0760730.056 0.813
Others038039   
Blood pressure checkup during this pregnancy     
When visited for ANC visit0770780.116 0.734
Others037034   
Permanent residence     
Urban area0870830.148 0.701
Rural area027029   
History of pregnancy Induced hypertension     
No1011000.027 0.869
Yes013012   

# = Fisher’s Exact Test, d. f=1

7. DISCUSSION

In present study the level of awareness regarding Pregnancy Induced Hypertension most of the respondents had moderate level of awareness (66.8%), followed by low level of awareness (19%) and high level of awareness (14.2%). This finding was similar to the finding in the study conducted at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), Kathmandu where maximum (47.7%) of the respondents had moderate level of awareness, followed by 34.4% inadequate level of awareness and 17.9% adequate level of awareness (Levels of Awareness – The Personal MBA). A study conducted at ANC OPD of tertiary care hospital in Chhattisgarh, showed that more than half (55%) of pregnant women had average knowledge regarding PIH followed by 31% poor knowledge and 14% good knowledge (Bloom’s Cutoff Categories for Knowledge and Attitude Scores, n.d.). Another study showed similar findings conducted at S.D.M. Hospital, Bikaner, India, 82% primigravida mothers have below average knowledge and 18% primigravida mothers have average knowledge regarding pregnancy induced hypertension (Tertiary Care Centers – MeSH). However contradict with the findings of the study conducted in Ekiti State, Nigeria, where 56.6% of respondent had good level of knowledge, followed by fair and poor level of knowledge on 31.7% and 11.7% respectively (Definition of Tertiary Care – Merriam-Webster).

In this study there was no association of awareness regarding Pregnancy Induced Hypertension with demographic variables which was supported by study conducted at public hospitals in Selangor, Malaysia where level of knowledge was not associated to any socio-demographic variables (Berhe et al., 2020). However contradicted by the study conducted at Sheikh Hasina Medical College, Tangail, Bangladesh, which showed association between socio-demographic variables such as age, area of residence, educational status, occupational status, socioeconomic status of respondents (Debebe Argago et al., 2025). Another study also contradicts the findings conducted at as it shows the association between level of knowledge with demographic variables such as, age, residence, type of family, occupation, education, family income (Tertiary Care Centers – MeSH).

8. CONCLUSION

The main aim of the study was to assess awareness regarding pregnancy induced hypertension among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital of Pokhara. In this study, about two-third of pregnant women had moderate level of awareness regarding PIH. The study showed no significance association between level of awareness and any of socio-demographic variables. Awareness raising program need to be conducted in the antenatal clinic to increase the knowledge level of pregnant women about PIH.

9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors sincerely acknowledge the support of colleagues and peers who provided valuable insights during the preparation of this research.

10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this research.

11. REFERENCES

  1. Bjelica A, Cetkovic N, Trninic-Pjevic A, Mladenovic-Segedi L. The phenomenon of pregnancy — a psychological view. Ginekologia Polska [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Feb 6];89(2):102–6. Available from: https://journals.viamedica.pl/ginekologia_polska/article/view/GP.a2018.0017
  2. Wilkerson RG, Ogunbodede AC. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2019 May;37(2):301–16. 
  3. Cífkova R. Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Overview. High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention [Internet]. 2023 June 13 [cited 2025 Aug 23];30(4):289. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10403432/
  4. Aghajanian: Current diagnosis and treatment obstetrics... - Google Scholar [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 6]. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Current%20Diagnosis%20and%20Treatment%20in%20Obstetrics%20and%20Gynecology&author=P%20Paola%20Aghajanian&author=S%20Ainbinder&author=E%20Andrew&author=VB%20Vicki&author=B%20Heather&publication_year=2006&
  5. Cifkova R. Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Overview. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023 July;30(4):289–303. 
  6. publichealthupdate. Annual report -Department of Health Services (DoHS) 2073/74(2016/2017) [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Feb 6]. Available from: https://publichealthupdate.com/annual-report-of-the-department-of-health-services-dohs/
  7. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 203: Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology [Internet]. 2019 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 23];133(1):e26. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/abstract/2019/01000/acog_practice_bulletin_no__203__chronic.50.aspx
  8. Outline of Definition and Classification of “Pregnancy induced Hypertension (PIH)” [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 9]. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsshp/1/1/1_3/_html/-char/ja
  9. Muti M, Tshimanga M, Notion GT, Bangure D, Chonzi P. Prevalence of pregnancy induced hypertension and pregnancy outcomes among women seeking maternity services in Harare, Zimbabwe. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders [Internet]. 2015 Oct 2 [cited 2025 Feb 10];15:111. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4592567/
  10. Naz R, Habib B, Bashir F, Ahmed S, Kazi A, Nisar S. Assessment of Pregnant Women for Information About Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Cross Sectional Study from a Teaching Hospital Outdoor. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Feb 5];16(12):600–600. Available from: https://pjmhsonline.com/index.php/pjmhs/article/view/3821
  11. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2025 Feb 10];77(1):67–75. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S0020-7292%2802%2980002-9
  12. 619316.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 6]. Available from: https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/619316
  13. Karrar SA, Martingano DJ, Hong PL. Preeclampsia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2025 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570611/
  14. Berhe AK, Ilesanmi AO, Aimakhu CO, Bezabih AM. Awareness of pregnancy induced hypertension among pregnant women in Tigray Regional State, Ethiopia. The Pan African Medical Journal [Internet]. 2020 Mar 11 [cited 2025 Feb 11];35:71. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7250223/
  15. Chaemsaithong P, Sahota DS, Poon LC. First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology [Internet]. 2022 Feb 1 [cited 2025 Feb 6];226(2):S1071-S1097.e2. Available from: https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(20)30741-9/fulltext
  16. Shrestha DB, Budhathoki P, Malbul K, Katwal S, Jha SK, Prajapati R, et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors and Outcome of Pregnancy induced Hypertension in Nepal: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2021 Sept 6;19(2):221–9. 
  17. Das S, Maharjan R, Bajracharya R, Shrestha R, Karki S, Das R, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational hypertension and preeclampsia at Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital, Nepal: A retrospective study. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2023 June 2 [cited 2025 Feb 7];18(6):e0286287. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286287
  18. Kintiraki E, Papakatsika S, Kotronis G, Goulis DG, Kotsis V. Pregnancy-Induced hypertension. Hormones [Internet]. 2015 Apr 1 [cited 2025 Feb 8];14(2):211–23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14310/horm.2002.1582
  19. Magee LA, Pels A, Helewa M, Rey E, Dadelszen P von, Magee LA, et al. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Executive Summary. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada [Internet]. 2014 May 1 [cited 2025 Feb 8];36(5):416–38. Available from: https://www.jogc.com/article/S1701-2163(15)30588-0/fulltext
  20. Dutta DC. DC Dutta’s Textbook of Obstetrics. JP Medical Ltd; 2015. 806 p. 
  21. Knowledge of Antenatal Women Regarding Pregnancy Induced Hypertension | PDF | Maternal Death | Pregnancy [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/561697975/IndianJContNsgEdn191109-4760176-131321
  22. Berhe AK, Ilesanmi AO, Aimakhu CO, Bezabih AM. Awareness of pregnancy induced hypertension among pregnant women in Tigray Regional State, Ethiopia. The Pan African Medical Journal [Internet]. 2020 Mar 11 [cited 2025 Feb 11];35:71. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7250223/
  23. Basnet S, Bhattarai SKG, Panta G. Knowledge Regarding Pregnancy Induced Hypertension among Pregnant Women Attending in a Tertiary Hospital. Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal [Internet]. 2023 Dec 31 [cited 2025 July 23];14(1):35–41. Available from: https://nepjol.info/index.php/jonen/article/view/66634
  24. Subedi D. Pregnancy Induced Hypertension and its Management. Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal [Internet]. 2014 Dec 31 [cited 2025 Oct 10];36(3):88–91. Available from: https://jiomnepal.edu.np/index.php/jiomnepal/article/view/581
  25. Levels of Awareness - The Personal MBA [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 9]. Available from: https://personalmba.com/levels-of-awareness/
  26. Bloom’s cutoff categories for the total knowledge and attitude scores. [Internet]. ResearchGate. [cited 2025 Feb 9]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Blooms-cutoff-categories-for-the-total-knowledge-and-attitude-scores_tbl1_352795263
  27. Tertiary Care Centers - MeSH - NCBI [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh?Db=mesh&term=Tertiary+Care+Centers
  28. Definition of TERTIARY CARE [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tertiary+care
  29. Berhe AK, Ilesanmi AO, Aimakhu CO, Bezabih AM. Awareness of pregnancy induced hypertension among pregnant women in Tigray Regional State, Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J. 2020; 35:71. 
  30. Debebe Argago Z, Dereje N, Philip NE. Prevalence and associated factors of pregnancy induced hypertension among pregnant women in public hospitals of Hadiya Zone, Central Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One [Internet]. 2025 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Oct 7];20(8):e0326236. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12316221